Join TVScoop on Facebook for exclusive competitions and gossip

TV Review: Jamie’s Ministry Of Food, Channel 4, Tuesday 30 September, 9pm

By Paul Hirons on October 1st, 2008 6 comments

MOFC4-0015+Natasha.jpg

The only surprise in Jamie Oliver’s new series was that the magnificent Timothy Spall was narrator. Very welcome his roughly hewn words were as well. Away from the voiceover, Jamie was back on our screens, embarking on his next food-based crusade. Yes, he had donned his white cloak, climbed on to his trusty steed and rode off into the sunset to save the world again. In this case, his steed was a big, f***-off Landrover and his trailed blazed its way all the way up to Rotherham.

IIf you like your Jamie Oliver, try reading our reviews of Hugh’s Chicken Run, and our Food TV section.


Everything seemed to going so well during the school dinners crusade – awareness was raised, important peoples’ palms were squeezed and he did actually change things around. Until he saw a woman on the television selling rubbish food to the slavering children through her local school’s gates. It was a staggering and utterly deflating piece of entrepreneurism, which singlehandedly pulled the rug from under Jamie’s noble plan in an second.

He should have learned a lesson from that project (that all the liberal ‘you must eat broccoli’ intent a person can muster will still be met with cynicism, a harsh economic reality and an unwillingness to change), but here he was again. The reason why he wanted to travel to Rotherham was to meet the woman who derailed his school dinners plan. The woman he also called an old scrubber when he appeared as a guest on Top Gear.

Apologies out of the way, Jamie was surprised to learn that Julie could actually cook rather well, and that wholesome, family recipes had been passed down to her from generation after generation. But Julie aside, plenty of people in Rotherham very obviously couldn’t cook and he was on a mission to banish the town’s junk food habits for good and get people cooking.

Good luck, Julie said, wryly.

Jamie, he said, would teach eight people to cook 10 simple recipes. Each person in the eight would then teach two of their friends, who would then teach two of their friends. Who would then teach two of their friends. Who would then… well, you get the picture. Soon the whole town would be cooking from scratch, ditching the junk and feeling a bit better about themselves.

Good luck, Julie said, wryly.

The trouble with Jamie’s programmes is that he’s created a genre pretty much all to himself. That’s quite an achievement, but when you’re a genre in your own lunchtime there’s a danger that formula and boredom ruins it before it has even started. Jamie’s Ministry Of Food teetered on this precipice for much of its series opener. Nothing wrong with Jamie’s cause – empowering people is a great thing – but I just sat there thinking: yep, seen this, watched this before, done this, yawn. Launch noble campaign, meet ordinary people, start project with some cooking, encounter resistence, project falls apart, end. Exactly to formula.

What makes these sorts of programmes watchable are, as ever, the real people who sign up for projects like this.

People like Natasha. Mum-of-two and on a benefits budget, she fed her children kebab and chips every night. They ate out of styrofoam cartons, sitting on the living room floor. She wanted to learn how to cook because she wanted her children to eat healthier and to experience real, family communal dining. She attacked the project with real gusto, and at the end of the first month or so of the project, she was cooking like a pro, feeling good about herself and life. Then the wheels fell off. When Jamie next visited, he encountered an almost broken woman who was pawning off her jewellery in order to keep up with buying fresh ingredients.

Quiet rightly, this shook Jamie. It’s alright steaming into a town in your Land Rover but the reality of fresh food, cooking from scratch and the food revolution in harsh economic times is a lot tougher than a sunny dash of southeast England idealism. Staggeringly, he stood there in the middle of the street after a teary encounter with Natasha saying to camera: “I’m not being big-headed but… it’s me that is making a difference to that woman’s life, it’s all down to me. Me me me, pukka me, I tell you.” Shocking bit of self-ego massage there, and an outburst that perhaps proves that Jamie might just be starting to disappear up his own Aga.

I’ll watch again, but you know what’s going to happen really – some people will cook and some will won’t.

And please, stop the gratuitous swearing Jamie. It’s getting a bit boring now.

Join TVScoop on Facebook for exclusive competitions and gossip
  • Mof Gimmers

    Something well worth reading regarding this show…

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2008/oct/01/foodanddrink.oliver

  • maureen thrower

    why was cookery lessons in schools taken away from children in the first place and what has happened to all the kitchens and equipment schools used to have. If you can afford a takeaway meal every night for the main meal then you can afford cheap mince and fresh veg salmon might be a bit ambitious on jamies part for people on low income so show them other fish just as good as salmon.its time for cooking to go back to basics and be taught at home and school

  • Angela Humble

    I enjoy watching Jamie on his cooking missions.
    Where can i get hold of the recipes he teaches his class as i would like to try them myself.

  • Paul Hirons

    HI Angela. Like most TV chefs, Jamie has a book out to accompany the series. Probably in all good bookshops…

  • Michelle Waters

    After watching this show I was appalled. My husband and I (who both work full time jobs) manage to cook interesting diverse foods almost every night including home-made bread, chutney, etc… I wasn’t appalled at the concept, I agree with Jamie more people should get in the kitchen and cook, but more at the glorification of the much-loved Natasha (who is my age and I manage to work) living off the good grace of the government whilst consuming copious amounts of take-away.

    She’s not the heroine of the up-standing-single-mum she’s the lazy cow who can’t be bothered to pull herself away from Jeremy Kyle for 1/2 an hour to cook her kids a healthy meal. She just got better and better because there was a very disturbing episode where she was blubbering endlessly about not being able to afford food (but she spends £10 a night on take-away?) so she had to pawn her jewellery and wasn’t coping, but for some reason she was smoking… I would NEVER buy fags if I couldn’t afford to feed my kids. I’m not inspired by her I’m disgusted by her.

    I usually love Jamie Oliver’s work, but this show irritates me.

  • http://www.mvpicton.co.uk The Shalom Family

    Let’s face it, nobody can can you to go where the heart and habit forbid!

    Britain has become a nation of whiners and voyeurs, not winners and diners. What do we all expect, good table manners aswell, a ‘please’ AND a ‘thankyou’? More likely a fart, a burp and “I WANT more curry, peas and chips”. You get out what you put in.

    And it’s not just the food. Britain has been self harvesting a freaky eater mental diet, of shallow selfish crap for years. Generally, the menatality now adopted as natural is, “What’s in it for me”? Well you can be sure of one thing……….NOTHING for as long as we all behave like this! However, for as long as there is a pulse (good food lol) and a even a pea sized sense of humour, there is always hope that things can get better.

    Peace Love and Your Favourite Recipes To All!




Related Posts with Thumbnails
Join TVScoop on Facebook for exclusive competitions and gossip